BPFK Section: Erasures
> > ek
> > gihek
> > jek
> > joik
> > interval
> > gek
> > guhek
> > gik
>
> It shuold be noted that these are technically words, not structures,
> and hence in some sense violate the concept of erasing by
> structures.
They are structures actually, even if not very major ones.
ek can be as complicated as {nase.unai} for example.
But I think {joik-ek} is the structure we want SA to recognize:
any term connective should be able to replace any other.
Also, all the (ek / joik) in the grammar should be replaced by
joik-ek, and the same for (jek / joik) and joik-jek
mu'o mi'e xorxes
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250