WikiDiscuss

WikiDiscuss


BPFK Section: Termsets

posts: 14214

On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 12:55:35PM -0800, Jorge Llamb?as wrote:
> So in the fourty-eight thousand lines of IRC there are zero
> instances of proper {nu'i gek term term /nu'u/ gik term term
> /nu'u/}.
>
> I think the PEG rule would have to be something like this:
>
> gek-termset <- gek terms-gik-terms
>
> terms-gik-terms <- term (gik / terms-gik-terms) term
>
> That way the number of terms grabbed after the gik would be the
> same as the number of terms between gek and gik.

Done.

mi klama nu'i ge le zarci le briju nu'u gi le zdani le ckule

and

mi klama ge le zarci le briju gi le zdani le ckule

now both parse in basically exactly the same way.

Note that nu'i...nu'u termsets are still perfectly valid.

-Robin

--
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/
Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!"
Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/