Controversial points in the morphology
> On Fri, 11 Feb 2005, Jorge LlambÃas wrote:
>
> > I find it outrageous that {sktkplgntriktrptrsft.} is a valid
> > name while {djeimz.} is not. What was the rationale for that
> > again?
>
> It is because JCB found out that /mz/ could not reliably be distinguished
> from /nz/. Why /mz/ was outlawed instead of /nz/ I suppose we'll never
> know.
Right, but is it really more difficult to distinguish mz form nz than
for example tststs from tstst?
mu'o mi'e xorxes
__
Do you Yahoo!?
The all-new My Yahoo! - What will yours do?
http://my.yahoo.com