WikiDiscuss

Posted by rlpowell on Tue 29 of Mar, 2005 02:51 GMT posts: 14214

On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 06:28:37PM -0300, Jorge Llamb?as wrote:
> I don't know why that would not be "Bancus and I had a
> conversation, they say on IRC", based on
> {la irk cu ve djuno lo se du'u mi joi la bancus cu casnu}.

I still don't respect that transformation, nor does the ma'oste.

> It seems to me that the default interpretation for cu'u/te cu'u/ve
> cu'u is that the main event corresponds to the x2 of cusku, which
> is the easiest place to relate to events. If not, why not?

Because there's no reason to impose that transformation, because it
violates basically all usage, and because it makes the words
useless.

-Robin

--
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/
Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!"
Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/