WikiDiscuss

On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 05:36:04 -0800 (PST), John E Clifford wrote:
> A new argument relates its sumti to the whole
> predication, not conversely. It just adds one
> more relation to the original; it does not take
> the original as a whole as a relatum.

A relationship F'(a,b,c) can always be defined as a composition
G(F(a,b), c), can't it?

All I'm doing is trying to figure out what G is in terms of the
underlying selbri of the BAI that adds argument c to F(a,b)
to give F'(a,b,c)

mu'o mi'e xorxes