WikiDiscuss

On Sat, 2005-06-11 at 11:51 -0300, Jorge Llambías wrote:
> On 6/11/05, Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 08:24:05PM -0300, Jorge Llamb?as wrote:
> > > I suspect the intention was the much more natural "What are the
> > > (logical) reasons you have for believing that?" rather than "what
> > > are the logical reasons that one would need for concluding that
> > > you believe that?".
> >
> > Boy, yeah, I don't think that second one was intended.
> >
> > Fixing.
>
> But my point was that the second one is not a correct reading
> of the Lojban, even though that's probably what was intended.
>
> ni'i ma do krici la'e di'u -> ma nibli lo du'u do krici la'e di'u
>
> Not the same as: {do krici la'e di'u lu'u ne ni'i ma}
>
> mu'o mi'e xorxes

I did in fact intend {ma nibli lo du'u do krici la'e di'u}, although I
admit the English gloss leaves much to be desired. I never said I'd make
a good commissioner. zo'o

--
Theodore Reed <treed@surreality.us>