WikiDiscuss

On 11/30/05, John E Clifford <clifford-j@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> --- Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On 11/29/05, John E Clifford
> > <clifford-j@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> > > 2. Neither kinds nor stages of individuals
> > seems
> > > to me to be like the real line in the
> > relevant
> > > ways.
> >
> > It depends on what you take to be *the*
> > relevant ways, I suppose.
> > In the only way I claimed them to be alike is
> > in their satisfying
> > all of the listed thesis except for the one
> > about breaking down
> > completely into individuals.
>
> Cases?

Cases of what?

> Well, {ru'i} doesn't seem to have anything to do
> with the cntinuum; it merely means "without
> significant interruption" "whenever there is an
> occasion" even.

So you take time to be *linguistically* discrete? Interesting.

mu'o mi'e xorxes